Horizontal Integration Definition Example Essays

The Meaning of Vertical and Horizontal Integration

  • Length: 752 words (2.1 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - More ↓
The Meaning of Vertical and Horizontal Integration

Horizontal integration is where an organisation owns two or more
companies, on the same level of the buying chain. An example of this
is the First Choice Group; they own First Choice Travel Agency and
First Choice Hypermarket, both of which are on the same level of the
buying chain. The advantage of horizontal integration is that it can
increase the company’s market share. Another good example of this type
of integration is when EasyJet purchased the airline Go from British
Airways. Now EasyJet and Go both operate under the company name of
EasyJet.

Vertical integration is when an organisation own companies on two or
more levels of the buying chain. Examples of this can be found within
“The Big 4,” all of them own an airline, travel agent and a tour
operator. The companies have until recently used different names for
their travel agency, airlines and tour operators, but now they are
power branding their companies so that customers can see whom they are
booking with. An example of this is TUI UK, which has rebranded its
companies using the Thomson name.

Task 2B

This diagram shows the vertical integration that Thomson used to
expand as an organisation.

Sector

2004 (Year)

2005 (Year)

Airline

Britannia Airways

Thomson Fly

Tour Operator

Thomson

Thomson

Travel Agent

Lunn Poly

Thomson

An example of Horizontal &

Vertical Integration

“The Big 4”

World Of TUI

Thomas Cook

My Travel Group

First Choice

Airline

Thomson Fly

Thomas Cook Airways

My Travel Lite

First Choice Airways

Tour Operator

Thomson

Thomas Cook Holidays

Airtours

First Choice

Travel Agent

Thomson Travel

Thomas Cook Travel

Going Places

First Choice Travel Shops

[IMAGE]

Airline

[IMAGE]

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"The Meaning of Vertical and Horizontal Integration." 123HelpMe.com. 10 Mar 2018
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=150321>.

LengthColor Rating 
Essay on Growing a Company by International Acquisition - For growth, businesses should know when and how to introduce change, usually by acquiring business operating over and beyond the borders. That is, at that point where they reach maturity, meaning that they have tackled all the possibilities of growth and there exists no more opportunities where they are currently based. The two major ways in which a company can grow are:- • Organic growth • Inorganic growth Organic growth comprises of increasing new sales and new customers for the existing business to improve in terms of profit....   [tags: horizontal integration, business operating]
:: 1 Works Cited
895 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
The Use of Horizontal and Vertical Integration by Carnegie in the Industrialization Period - ... He owned a large portion of the American steel industry called the Carnegie Steel Company. His industry was one of the most profitable enterprises in the 1890’s. Carnegie had many great innovations, but one in particular was vertical integration which the source of the raw materials needed to compose his form of steel. Using vertical integration helped Carnegie and his employees know what exactly was going into Carnegie’s steel so it could be trusted. According to A E Networks (2013), “He wanted ownership of the resources he needed, their delivery system, and the final manufacturer of the product.” Later in his lifetime he sold his company to another large business owner, J.P....   [tags: company, own, business, wealth]683 words
(2 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Horizontal and Vertical Boundaries of the Firm Essay examples - 1. What are the differences between horizontal and vertical boundaries of the firm. Integration determines the ownership and control of assets, and it is through ownership and control that firms are able to exploit contractual incompleteness. It determines who gets control resources, make decisions, and allocate profits when contracts are incomplete and trading partners disagree. Horizontal integration is the process of acquiring or merging with industry competitors (ex. acquisitions and mergers) to increase market share....   [tags: commercial and business concepts]1199 words
(3.4 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Horizontal and Vertical Ocean Currents Essay - Horizontal and vertical ocean currents Ocean currents are horizontal or vertical movement of both surface and deep water throughout the world’s oceans (Briney, n.d.). The primary generating forces are wind and differences in water density caused by variations in temperature and salinity. Currents generated by these forces are modified by factors such as the depth of the water, ocean floor topography and deflection by the rotation of the Earth. Horizontal currents are wind driven, fast moving and carries small amount of water; while, vertical currents are slow moving, density driven and carries large bodies of water....   [tags: surface current, winds, warm air]
:: 4 Works Cited
1324 words
(3.8 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
What´s Manufacturing Vertical Intregration? Essay - ... BT that claims its own particular backhaul is not presented to purchasing an excess of or excessively little backhaul limit from an outsider supplier and can so run all the more resourcefully. In including, it doesn't need to pay for that outsider edge. The ensuing sparing could be disseminated between the business and its clients, consequently producing suitable playing point and in addition enhanced productivity. Those profits may be behind Vodafone's late £1 billion obtaining of the Cable & Wireless Worldwide business in the UK....   [tags: operational efficiencies, productivity]890 words
(2.5 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Essay about Corporate Business: Horizontal integration - “ANALYSIS OF CURRENT STRATEGY” Corporate level of strategy: A corporate strategy should enable a company, or one or more of its business units, to perform one or more of the value creation functions at a lower cost or in a way that allows for differentiation and a premium price. .(Hill&jones 2013,p.334). Consequently, as the level of corporate strategy tom tome used integration method which has the most prominent integration was Horizontal integration and horizontal alliance. Furthermore as the level of corporate strategy the related diversification also implemented....   [tags: functional level, market, business level]
:: 2 Works Cited
922 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Designing Lift Surfaces: The Horizontal and Vertical Tails Essay examples - TAIL DESIGN INTRODUCTION The horizontal tail and vertical tail along with wing are referred to as the lifting surfaces. The major difference between wing design and tail design originates from the primary function of the tail which is different from the wing. The primary function of the wing is to generate the maximum or substantial amount of lift, while the tail is designed to operate normally at only a fraction of its ability to generate the required lift potential. During a flight mission, if at any moment the tail reaches its maximum angle of attack which refers to the tail stall angle; is an indication of design process error.[1][2]The tail in a conventional unmanned aerial vehicle ofte...   [tags: aeronautical engineering]
:: 4 Works Cited
1598 words
(4.6 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
Vertical Intergration Essay - According to a North American dictionary entry vertical integration is defined as “merging of companies in supply chain: the merging of companies that are in the chain of companies handling a single item from raw material production to retail sale” (“Vertical Integration,” 2009). Though the definition of vertical integration is quite simple the concept is much more complicated than one may think. There are four strategic factors that must be established by business leaders before the implementation of vertical integration can take place that must be well-thought-out in order to achieve any level of success....   [tags: Business Management ]
:: 3 Works Cited
923 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
The Pros and Cons of Vertical Integration Essay - It leads to reduction of transportation costs as the common ownership results in closer geographic proximity. The transaction costs can be controlled if a firm acquires the other firms in the vertical chain, then one division of the same company will transfer goods to other divisions. So, transaction costs in form of transport, cost of negotiation, cost of control etc. will be eliminated. The overall average cost of the firm will decrease because if the divisions are under same management control then there will be in house supply and departmental heads will determine the transfer price....   [tags: essays research papers]1124 words
(3.2 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Vertical integration in studio system Essay - Vertical integration in studio system The term "vertical integration" refers to the structure of a marketplace, which is integrated (rather than segregated) at a variety of crucial levels. In the case of the motion picture industry, the studio system established a market in which the studios owned production facilities, distribution outlets, and theaters. In other words, the studios controlled every level of the marketplace from the top down, from production to exhibition. "Vertical integration" began in the 1910s and inspired the postwar consolidation of the studio system as national distribution companies, such as Paramount merged with production companies, such as Famous Players and Lask...   [tags: Economics]488 words
(1.4 pages)
Good Essays[preview]

Related Searches

Integration         Vertical Integration         Travel Agency         Market Share         Thomson         Easyjet         Cook         Tour         Booking         Diagram        






Tour Operator

Travel Agent

Task 2C

Using the information you have presented for Task 2A & 2B, and explain
the effects of integration on the structure of the travel and tourism
industry in general.

The structure of the industry has changed due to the amount of
integration. Integration has a positive and negative impact on the
industry. Vertical integration is when an organisation wishes to buy
another organisation on a different level of the buying chain. An
example of this is shown above, Thomson brought the airline, Britannia
Airways and also Lunn Poly, a travel agent. This shows how Thomson has
been vertically integrated. As Thomson brought Britannia Airways it
has allowed them to offer customers lower fares. This means that the
tour operator is making more profit. The same is not true for travel
agents, they are paid a low rate of commission, and therefore most of
profit will go to the tour operator. Integration is good as it allows
the organisation to control their pricing and communicate well with
companies on all levels of the chain.

Horizontal integration is when an organisation buys another
organisation on the same level of the buying chain. A good example of
this, when “Go” a budget airline owned by British Airways was taken
over by EasyJet in 2002. When the companies merged EasyJet “power
branded” this means that all of the logos and names that Go had used
previously where replaced by the EasyJet name and logo. This had a
negative impact on customers, EasyJet has more market control, and
this allows them to dictate what the prices can be. The positive side
of this integration is that EasyJet now has more customers flying with
them and therefore can have more market space to promote themselves.

Tour operators have an advantage over travel agents has they have a
bigger market share. When a tour operator is integrated with a travel
agent, the travel agent will sell the products and services of tour
operator. The tour operator has control on the amount of the
commission that the travel agents will receive. If the travel agent
doesn’t wish to accept the offer, they may lose a lot of business, as
they are not selling as many products, to cater for the customers
needs.

Independent travel agents are being seriously affected by integration,
big companies such as First Choice, are controlling the amount of
commission travel agents receive. They are also losing commission as
tour operators and airlines are selling their products and services
direct on the Internet. Older customers still prefer to use high
street travel agents as they may not know how to use the Internet or
would like the reassurance of booking in person. Travel agents are
having to change to meet the needs of the customer, and are turning to
the ‘niche’ market to make commission.

Airlines have also been affected by integration, British Airways
wanted to merge with American Airlines, but IATA declined their
proposal, as they would be able to dominate the pricing of
transatlantic flights from the UK.

Horizontal and vertical integration has reduced competition within the
industry, as more organisations are buying each other out to expand
due to the demand that is being received from the public for their
products and services. Companies that are integrating are able to set
the price, and smaller companies such as Collette Worldwide Holidays,
will be unable to compete. The risk that larger companies take when
integrating, is small compared to independent organisations. Larger
organisations, such as Travelcare make a bigger profit and therefore
it will not affect the organisation, if the merge doesn’t work.
Smaller companies like Southall Travel may have their business ruined
if it doesn’t work.



Vertical integration is the merging together of two businesses that are at different stages of production—for example, a food manufacturer and a chain of supermarkets. Merging in this way with something further on in the production process (and thus closer to the final consumer) is known as forward integration.

Vertical integration can be contrasted to horizontal integration, the merging together of businesses that are at the same stage of production, such as two supermarkets, or two food manufacturers. Merging with something further back in the process (if a food manufacturer were to merge with a farm, say) is known as backward integration. The integration of two organisations that are in completely different lines of business is sometimes referred to as conglomerate integration.

Businesses are downstream or upstream of each other depending on whether they are nearer to or further away from the final consumer (the “sea”, as it were, to which the river of production flows).

The benefits of vertical integration come from the greater capacity it gives organisations to control access to inputs (and to control the cost, quality and delivery times of those inputs). In line with the changing organisational structure of the late 20th century, however, this logic became less compelling. In the late 1990s, consultants McKinsey & Company wrote:

Whereas historically firms have vertically integrated in order to control access to scarce physical resources, modern firms are internally and externally disaggregated, participating in a variety of alliances and joint ventures and outsourcing even those activities normally regarded as core.

Some of the best known examples of vertical integration have been in the oil industry. In the 1970s and 1980s, many companies that were primarily engaged in exploration and the extraction of crude petroleum decided to acquire downstream refineries and distribution networks. Companies such as Shell and BP came to control every step involved in bringing a drop of oil from its North Sea or Alaskan origins to a vehicle's fuel tank.

The idea of vertical integration was taken a step further by Dell Computer, one of the most successful companies of the 1990s. Michael Dell, its founder, said that he combined the traditional vertical integration of the supply chain with the special characteristics of the virtual organisation to create something that he called “virtual integration”. Dell assembles computers from other firms' parts, but it has relationships with those firms that are more binding than the traditional links between buyer and supplier. It does not own them in the way of the vertically integrated firm, but through exchanges of information and a variety of loose associations it achieves much the same aim—what Michael Dell calls “a tightly co-ordinated supply chain”.

Vertical integration is a difficult strategy for companies to implement successfully. It is often expensive and hard to reverse. Upstream producers frequently integrate with downstream distributors to secure a market for their output. This is fine when times are good. But many firms have found themselves cutting prices sharply to their downstream distributors when demand has fallen just so they can maintain targeted levels of plant utilisation.

The vertically integrated giants of the computer industry, firms such as IBM, Digital and Burroughs, were felled like young saplings when at the end of the 1970s Apple formed a network of independent specialists that produced machines far more efficiently than the do-it-all giants.

Further reading

Dell, M., Magretta, J. and Rollins, K., “The power of virtual integration: an interview with Dell Computer's Michael Dell”, Harvard Business Review, March–April 1998

Harrigan, K.R., “Vertical Integration, Outsourcing and Corporate Strategy”, Beard Books, 2003

Stuckey, J. and White, D., “When and When Not to Vertically Integrate”, McKinsey Quarterly, No. 3, 1993

More management ideas

This article is adapted from “The Economist Guide to Management Ideas and Gurus”, by Tim Hindle (Profile Books; 322 pages; £20). The guide has the low-down on over 100 of the most influential business-management ideas and more than 50 of the world's most influential management thinkers. To buy this book, please visit our online shop.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *