Aqa A2 History Coursework Word Limit For Uc

1. Stick to your word limit, its 2000 words for a reason. Also you do not want to be penalised for writing too much.

2. In your introduction really focus on the historic event you are assessing, make explicit reference to it, supporting with statistics or relevant historic policies.

3. Clearly concentrate on your coursework question, make clear in your introduction what the different interpretation`s views of this question are. Which ones you think are the most credible and why, support with historical evidence. Then make your judgment.

4. Remember at the end of the day your coursework is indeed similar to an AS History source exam. So structure it and think of it as an essay.

5. Some schools may have given you a structure for how to tackle the sources. If they have use it, it will assist the flow and structure of your essay. If they have not given you a structure, familiarize yourself with each of the interpretations. Additionally you might find it useful to start with the interpretations which support the question.

6. In your planning stages ensure you include all of the relevant quotes from whichever of the interpretations you are examining. You might find it useful to create a table for this.

7. Then you want to briefly examine or explain this quote in your own words and demonstrate how this supports the historian`s interpretation or view. Again you could include this in the table in a new column.

8. Next still using your table justify and support your analysis so far with relevant historical evidence to support the interpretation. This could be another column in your table.

9. Ensure you frequently refer to and demonstrate with quotes, explanation/analysis or historic evidence the historian`s credibility, persuasiveness or demonstrate the strength of their argument. Again use the terms "credibility", "credible argument", "credible", "supported" etc...

10. Introduce the next interpretation by noting how it is similar to the first. E.g. "Similarly" then follow the same format as before.

11. Then highlight the limitations or weaknesses of these interpretations by explaining what they have omitted or not examined.

12. Next demonstrate how the next interpretation differs from the previous interpretation, then follow the same format for this and your final interpretation.

13. Your conclusion should explain which two sources are the most credible and why, then answer the question

Best wishes with your coursework everyone.

This resource was uploaded by: Michele

Other articles by this author

Landco Contracting Ltd.

When it comes to Fraser Valley excavation, knowing how to anticipate what is under the surface can be just as important as understanding demolition. This region has seen vast change, with soil conditions changing from farm to residential, organic soft soil to gravel from nearby rivers. Whether offering our services as a demolition company for that old home or commercial building or providing the expertise as an excavation company for sewer tie-ins in a new sub-division, we have the experience to deliver. You can see from the wide range of projects we have done, that we can handle anything from the smallest residential repair job to working alongside large construction companies. We have helped Fraser Valley residents with the creation of critical retaining walls, cleared land for new buildings and even provided trenchless technology for pipe lining under driveways. Our experience in hydro and telephone installation and solving drainage problems has made us a valuable part of the Fraser Valley excavation community. Our attention to detail as well as flexibility when it comes to unexpected issues has made our site servicing, demolition and landscape capabilities among the best in the Fraser Valley.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *