What Is Hate Crime Essay

Hate crimes are a specific type of crime committed against individuals or groups because of their race, religion, sexual orientation, gender, age, or ethnicity. Genocide is an extreme form of hate crime, and other examples include cross burnings, physical assault and even threatening text messages. Hate crimes often come about through differences between in groups and out groups, the animosity felt between them, and they are enabled through the behavior of sympathizers and spectators. As an upward law, or a law designed to punish dominant groups in society, rather than a downward law, which is designed to punish subordinate groups, hate crime laws are often underenforced. Beginning with an historical review of hate crimes, this article moves on to a discussion of the causes of hate crimes, continues with ways in which hate crimes can be prevented, and ends with a debate over the merits of additional hate crime legislation on the federal level.

RESEARCH STARTERS

ACADEMIC TOPIC OVERVIEWS

Deviance & Social Control > Overview of Hate Crimes

Overview

Hate crimes are a specific form of crime in which a person or group is verbally and/or physically attacked because of their gender, sexual orientation, religion, politics, race, ethnicity, disability, or age. Sociologists have identified several ways in which hate can be manifested. These include physical attacks; property damage; bullying tactics; insults; and threatening phone calls, e-mails, text messages, instant messages, or letters.

History of Hate Crimes

While hate crimes have received considerable attention in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, the phenomenon is hardly new. One especially grievous example of hate crimes have been those perpetrated against the Jewish people since even before the time of Jesus, and culminating in the Holocaust during World War II, which is perhaps the greatest hate crime in human history. Other well-known examples of hate crimes include genocides in Armenia, Bosnia, Rwanda, and Sudan; cross burnings, lynchings, and other actions of the Ku Klux Klan against African Americans in the United States; and threats and violence against gays and lesbians throughout the world.

In the twenty-first century, as migration patterns are resulting in a world that is more racially, ethnically, culturally, socially, and religiously mixed than it has ever been, hate crimes--crimes against the Other--have attracted considerable public attention. In some ways old hatreds have been given new life. "By 2003, there were more anti-Jewish hate attacks in European countries than at any time since World War II" (Levin, 2007, p. 81).

Researchers have noted that the concept of a hate crime presupposes a community that is morally outraged at prejudice of all kinds, and any particularly prejudicial attitudes and actions toward presumptive victim groups. According to Mason (2007), hate crime

… has a heavy investment in the capacity of its victim groups to convince the general public that they have been unjustly harmed. The process by which victim status is accorded to a given group is thus far from objective. Rather, it is the product of 'collective definitions that have been developed by watchdog organisations' and 'contested in legal and public arenas' (Jenness & Broad, 1997, p. 173) (Mason, 2007, p. 265).

Hate Crimes in the United States

Hate crimes in the United States have deep roots in American history and culture. As the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) notes,

Crimes of hatred and prejudice--from lynchings to cross burnings to vandalism of synagogues--are a sad fact of American history, but the term "hate crime" did not enter the nation's vocabulary until the 1980s, when emerging hate groups like the Skinheads launched a wave of bias-related crime ("Hate Crime," 2008b).

In response to these disturbing trends, 45 states have passed hate crime laws. All these states define a hate crime as a criminal act perpetrated due to the victim's race, religion, and ethnicity, while some also include sexual orientation, gender, and disability as criteria for hate crimes. Only Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina, and Wyoming do not have hate crime statutes on their books, though hate crimes in those states are prosecuted under existing statutes covering murder, theft, harassment, and assault.

According to the 2007 FBI Hate Crime Statistics, there were 7,222 "single-bias" criminal hate crime incidents involving 9,080 offenses and 9,652 victims (defined as "a person, business, institution, or society as a whole") in 2006. An FBI analysis of those incidents revealed the following:

Table 1: Some 2006 Hate Crime Statistics

Motivation Percentage Most impacted group Racial bias 51.8% African Americans Religious bias 18.9% Jews Sexual-orientation bias 15.5% Male homosexuals Ethnicity/national origins bias 12.7% Hispanics Disability bias 1% Mentally disabled

(from "Hate Crime Statistics," 2007, http://www.fbi.gov /ucr/hc2006/index.html)

Apart from the FBI statistics, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reported a 24 percent increase in racial harassment reports between 2006 and 2007. The figure is double what it was in 1991 (Bello, 2008, p. 3a).

Hate Crimes against Muslims after September 11, 2001

The attacks of September 11, 2001, sent shockwaves through American society. Coordinated terrorist attacks in New York City and Washington, DC, brought home to many Americans that the United States is not immune to being attacked on its own soil. Because the attacks were carried out exclusively by self-professed Muslims, the attacks also shined a spotlight, perhaps for the first time, on the 2.35 million Muslims living in the United States (Pew Research Center, 2007, pp. 9-10), as well as on college and university students from Muslim-majority nations studying in the United States.

Researchers have found that the expected spike in anti-Muslim hate crime did occur in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 attacks. As one team of researchers noted, "with over 400 cases of anti-Islamic hate crime occurring nationally in the weeks after 9/11, in-group and out-group social psychology may have been amplified by the terrorist events" (Byers & Jones, 2007, p. 53).

These researchers also found, however, that the anti-Muslim hate crimes followed a specific pattern of intensity: "The time series analysis also showed that the effect of 9/11 largely dissipated within eight days of September 11. That is, the daily reports of anti-Islamic hate crimes began to level off yet did not return, on average, to the lower levels prior to 9/11" (Byers & Jones, 2007, pp. 53-54). Most curiously, given the locations of the terrorist attacks, "New York City and Washington, DC, anti-Islamic hate crime reports are essentially non-existent (DC did have one report). With the exception of Boston, MA, all other locations on the list of top 10 cities with anti-Islamic hate crime reports in 2001 were some distance from both NYC and DC" (Byers & Jones, 2007, p. 54).

In seeking to explain the spike in anti-Muslim hate crimes more generally, the researchers noted the pivotal role played by political, religious, and community leaders, "Some of this effect may be accounted for by pleas in the media from Islamic and political leaders calling for calm and tolerance" (Byers & Jones, 2007, pp. 53-54).

As for the somewhat counterintuitive finding that anti-Muslim hate crimes were markedly absent from police blotters in New York City and Washington, DC, the research team suggested that this

… could be accounted for by the leveling of social distinctions as shown by previous researchers (Blocker, Rochford, & Sherkat, 1991; Gonzolas-Garcia & Soriano-Parra, 1989; Neal, 1984; Turkel, 2002). In short, and consistent with the theory of in-group and outgroup differences, such distinctions may have become less important given the collective community level trauma and the "leveling of social distinctions" (Quarantelli & Dynes, 1976) (Byers & Jones, 2007, p. 54).

In other words, the trauma of the attacks drew people in New York and Washington, DC, together rather than driving them apart.

An extensive survey of Muslim Americans conducted by the Pew Research Center five years after the September 11 attacks found that "[a] quarter of Muslim Americans say they have been the victim of discrimination in the United States, while 73% say they have never experienced discrimination while living in this country" (Pew Research Center, 2007, p. 4).

Illegal Immigration

One of the most controversial social and political issues in the United States in the early twenty-first century has involved illegal immigrants, also known as undocumented workers. Should they be allowed to stay in the country, and under what conditions? Could they be stopped from coming to America altogether? The vast majority of illegal immigrants come from Mexico and elsewhere in Latin and Central America (Passel, 2005, p. 2), and a considerable portion of the American public believes there are good moral and economic grounds for taking a tougher stand against these migrants. While much of the opposition to illegal immigration is conducted within legal boundaries and does not spill over into hatred and violence, hateful attitudes and actions have emerged.

FBI statistics show that the number of hate crimes perpetrated against Hispanics rose 25 percent between 2004 and 2008. Some, such as the Hispanic civil rights group the National Council of La Raza, attribute the increase to a spike in media coverage of illegal immigration (Ramirez, 2008, p. 14). The Anti-Defamation League agrees; Deborah Lauter, its civil rights director adds, "When we saw the rhetoric shift from a legitimate debate to one where immigrants were dehumanized, we believe it inspired extremists and [some] mainstream Americans to...

Hate Crime Laws

  • Length: 645 words (1.8 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - More ↓
Hate Crime Laws

     Since the United States of America and long with the whole world is filled with diversity there will always be conflicts about believes and feelings towards each other. Many people have their believes and keep them to themselves. Then there are the type of people that feel they have to put their believes into actions and hurt others or destroy things to get their point across. These believes that hurt and destroy others things and lives are called hate crimes. Hate crimes are becoming more and more common everyday. FBI statistics show that the frequency hate crimes in America are increasing as the frequency regular crimes in America have been decreasing.
     With the increase in hate crimes in America, minority groups are starting to become the prey of the beasts who commit these awful crimes. So the minority groups (Asians, African Americans, Jewish people, Homosexuals, and others) have been pushing to have hate crime laws passed to protect them from violence and ridicule. The laws that are in affect now are only slightly protective of the minorities in hate crimes. The laws that are in state right now say that a hate crime offender can only be prosocuted for their crimes if they are prohibiting the minority or victum of the hate crime from a “federally protected right”. Such as attending school, voting and etc. The victums of hate crimes do not think that these laws are very strict. The victoms are demanding newer stricter laws. The victoms or minorities want these newer stricter laws because basically they have no protection from violence. The old laws basically just state that if you are prohibiting the person from doing something you are at fault. Well the minorities want these stiffened and they want them to be harsher. An example of what the minorities want is any act done against anyone with intent to cause bodily harm or death because the person was part of a minority group will carry the fine of being federally prosecuted and with that there is the chance of the death penalty.
With making the laws more strict the victums of hate crimes will be gaining more security and more protection from having violence and abuse taken out on them.
     There really is no opposition to making the laws stricter because it seems that most of the hate crimes that are happening are mostly random acts and just young kids creating stupid acts.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Hate Crime Laws." 123HelpMe.com. 10 Mar 2018
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=68861>.

LengthColor Rating 
Hate Crime Laws Essay - On June 7, 1998, 49-year-old James Byrd Jr. of Texas accepted a ride from three white men, who then beat him severely, urinated on him, chained him by his ankles to the back of their pick-up truck, dragged him for three miles into the countryside, and dumped his corpse in front of an African-American cemetery (Graczyk). A little over a year later, a jury sentenced ring leader John King to death by lethal injection (“Man Executed for Dragging Death of James Byrd”). While this particular case may give the appearance that perpetrators of hate crimes receive appropriate punishment, almost a decade later, one particular case demonstrates the inequity in the application of hate crime punishments:...   [tags: U.S. Law]
:: 4 Works Cited
1944 words
(5.6 pages)
Term Papers[preview]
Hate Crime Laws: Are They Constitutional? Essay - Are hate crime penalty enforcement laws constitutional. “That’s Gay.” If you are around teenagers today, that is a phrase you will most likely hear very often. It is not necessarily meant as a homophobic or hate-filled remark, and most of the time it is referring to an object, an idea, or a conversation; things that obviously have no sexual orientation. But now, according to a bill passed by the senate, it could almost be considered a hate crime. Many people support the widening of hate crime laws, assuming that with stricter penalties, the crimes will lessen....   [tags: essays research papers fc]
:: 2 Works Cited
1568 words
(4.5 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Hate Crime Laws Essay - Hate Crime Laws Since the United States of America and long with the whole world is filled with diversity there will always be conflicts about believes and feelings towards each other. Many people have their believes and keep them to themselves. Then there are the type of people that feel they have to put their believes into actions and hurt others or destroy things to get their point across. These believes that hurt and destroy others things and lives are called hate crimes. Hate crimes are becoming more and more common everyday....   [tags: essays research papers]645 words
(1.8 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
The Problems with Hate Crime Legislation Essay - Introduction When the topic of hate and bias crime legislation is brought up two justifications commonly come to mind. In her article entitled “Why Liberals Should Hate ‘Hate Crime Legislation” author Heidi M. Hurd discusses the courts and states views that those who commit hate and bias crimes ought to be more severely punished. She takes into consideration both sides of the argument to determine the validity of each but ultimately ends the article in hopes to have persuaded the reader into understanding and agreeing with her view that laws concerning the punishment of hate and bias laws should not be codified....   [tags: Hate Crime Farce]
:: 2 Works Cited
1649 words
(4.7 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
The Fight Against Hate Essay - In the summer of 1998, James Byrd Jr. was chained to the back of a pickup truck and dragged for two miles along a dirt road by a group of people who were prejudice against his race. Four months later, two young men beat Matthew Shepard with a pistol and left him tied to a fence all night in near freezing weather because he was gay. These two attacks sent outrage throughout the country and inspired tougher punishments against hate crimes. (A hate crime is any crime that is committed due to a bias towards a particular group of people.) Currently, forty states and the District of Columbia have passed hate crime laws....   [tags: Crime Laws, Discrimination, Sexual Orientation]
:: 8 Works Cited
1278 words
(3.7 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Hate Crime Essay - Hate Crime                                          Violence motivated by a bias against victims’ characteristics which include race, religion, ethnic background, national origin, gender, or sexual orientation, represents a serious threat to all communities. Experts estimate that a bias-related crime is committed every 14 minutes. Criminal justice officials and state policy makers need to realize that it is key to make or adjust hate crime legislation. This has been a heated debate for centuries....   [tags: Violence Racism Hate Crimes Essays]1499 words
(4.3 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay on Hate Crimes Against Gays -     In October of 1998, America finally became aware of how deadly discrimination can be. In Laramie, Wyoming, 21-year old college student Matthew Shepard was brutally beaten by two men and tied to a fence, left for dead. Matthew's murderers set out only to rob him, but ended up beating him so severely that he never regained consciousness before he died. Why did this happen in the first place. Simply because Matthew was gay. Matthew's death became a national symbol of violence against homosexuals, prompting prayer vigils and calls for state and federally supported hate crime laws....   [tags: Gay Hate Crimes]
:: 4 Works Cited
906 words
(2.6 pages)
Good Essays[preview]
The History Behind Hate Crime and the Existing Legislation Essay - The History Behind Hate Crime and the Existing Legislation Many political scientists and researchers to a number of policy arenas in the United States ranging from corporal punishment to the quality of urban life have applied Daniel Elazar’s concept of political cultures. For a vast majority of these policy programs, a considerable correlation has been found to exist between the region examined and its approach to a specific policy. Elazar focused on three primary political cultures: the Moralist political culture (MPC), the Individual political culture (IPC), and the Traditional political culture (TPC)....   [tags: Hate Crime Violence Criminalization Essays]
:: 7 Works Cited
4215 words
(12 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
Hate Crimes and The Mitchell v. Wisconsin Decision Essay - Hate Crimes and The Mitchell v. Wisconsin Decision The American Heritage Dictionary defines hate as intense dislike or animosity. However, defining hate as the basis for a crime is not as easy without possibly jeopardizing constitutional rights in the process. Hate crime laws generally add enhanced punishments to existing statues. A hate crime law seeks to treat a crime, if it can be demonstrated that the offense was a hate crime differently from the way it would be treated under ordinary criminal law....   [tags: Hate Crime Criminal History Justice Essays]
:: 8 Works Cited
5777 words
(16.5 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
Hate Crime Essay - On October tenth of 2004, eleven Christians were arrested for street witnessing on a public sidewalk during a “gay pride” event. Charges were dropped against six of them, but four adults and one juvenile faced serious charges under Philadelphia's hate crime laws. These five people were charged with criminal conspiracy, “ethnic intimidation”, reckless endangerment, and inciting a riot. Each person, if convicted, faced 47 years in prison and a $90,000 fine. The state of Pennsylvania recently added “ethnic intimidation” to its hate crime law on December 5, 2002....   [tags: essays research papers]387 words
(1.1 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]

Related Searches

Hate Crime Laws         Minority Groups         Attending School         Jewish People         Hate Crimes        




Although there are the groups out there like the Skinheads and the KKK which create acts against people who tend to be different then them. These people look at the making these laws more strict as being a threat to what they are about. Most likely they are thinking that these laws will not let them say what they mean and express their views to the world. They will want clauses added into the laws and other things to make sure that they will not be descriminated against.
     When I started writing this paper I was pro strengthening the hate crimes laws. When I ended writing this paper I stand in the same position I started in. There is no way people should be hurt because of their sexual preference, religion, or race. This country and the world definitely is in trouble because we can not seem to get around the fact that some of us our different. If we can not accept the worlds deversity then there will never be an end to hate crimes no matter what laws are passed. Once we understand that a person is a person no matter what race, sexual preference, or religion they are that will be the cure for hate crimes. So I think there should be more education of our young children on different things and less coverage of hate crimes and bad news in the media.



Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *