Essay about Causes of Car Accidents
683 WordsMar 12th, 20133 Pages
Causes of car accidents
Car accidents can happen to drivers anytime, anywhere. "According to the National Safety Council, which stated that more than 2.5 million collisions back every year, making it the most common type of car accidents, it is also known that the accident rear end as incidents of injury, because the nature of the collision leads often in whiplash injury the driver in the car in front and about 20% of people who participated in a rear collision injury symptoms of this kind. ", (NHTSA, auto-accident-resource.com). Among the car accidents, the teenage group is the only age group who is number of deaths is increasing instead of decreasing. Also, all the people are exposed to risk and actually every one of them has got car…show more content…
When a cell phone is used while driving, it distracts the attention of the driver, leading to car accidents. While using a cell phone many people tend to miss traffic signals, because they are not really concentrating on driving. The process of dialing or answering the phone can make them lose control of the vehicle as well. Even though the driver is looking at the road, he or she can easily get distracted by the conversation. This can result in fatal accidents.
Third reason of accidents on the road is teenage drivers. “2,739 teenagers died in car accidents in the United States during 2008 ", (drivesteady.com). Some teenagers cause fatal accidents, because of immaturity and lack of experience. Teenagers are very impulsive. Although not intending to hurt anyone, they sometimes drive very aggressively. It is not difficult to find teenagers driving with one hand on the steering wheel, seat pushed back, and with loud music playing. In traffic they go wild, trying to seek attention. They underestimate the risk of what they are doing. All these acts result in serious consequences on the road. Many accidents of young drivers result from their own mistakes.
In conclusion, many people do not realize that being intoxicated while driving, using cellular phones and teenage drivers may bring serious injuries to everybody. Some people may enjoy drinking without care until they get into car accident, which can even result in
Children are powerful agents of change and should be included during the development and implementation of child injury prevention projects at local, national and international levels.
The following is an essay written by sixteen-year-old Anupama Kumar of Kerala, India. She won the UNICEF Voices of the Youth road safety essay competition and received her award during the World Youth Assembly, held at the Palais des Nations of the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland in April 2007.
“1.2 million die in road accidents each year. A child is killed in an accident every three minutes. Road safety is increasingly becoming a major killer and a worldwide concern, particularly for young people. What can we do to address the issue?
The media has been a largely overlooked factor in creating road safety awareness. Celebrity endorsements, coupled with television messages on prime-time slots and peer education programmes would provide an accessible and engaging means of promoting awareness, particularly among young people. They would convey the message that safe driving is “cool” driving, and constantly reinforce that drunken driving, using a cell phone on the road and driving without a seat-belt (or helmet) are not only dangerous, but “seriously unfashionable”. Celebrities could also actively encourage walking or cycling whenever and wherever possible.
Role-plays, “make-believe” situations, movies and field trips could be used as effective learning tools for children at school. Safe Road User awards at the school level would provide an incentive for many children to follow road safety rules. Road safety education programmes can also be extended to adults at the workplace, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds. This would hold particular importance for parents, and efforts must be made to involve them as much as possible.
There is a need for stricter licensing laws, particularly with regard to public transport operators. Laws could require prominent display of the driver’s licence on his or her vehicle while driving, in addition to safety regulations (such as adequate maintenance and the use of the seat-belt) and random breath testing policies. Policies could provide for the creation of better roads and pavements, supervised playing areas for children and monitored crossings near schools.
Citizens must campaign for safer, wider roads and better sidewalks to limit accidents. Speed governors in each vehicle would provide a low-cost solution to speeding. There is also a need to provide well-maintained, safe and efficient public transport systems, particularly in developing nations. Fingerprint identification systems, similar to those in laptop computers, could be used in each vehicle, with each vehicle responding only to a programmed set of fingerprints.
For any effective change in the safety of our roads, however, we need to consciously change our attitudes towards providing safer roads – not just for ourselves or for young people, but for everyone.”
Main messages from the report
This report, the first world report on the topic of child injuries, presents the current knowledge about the five most important causes of unintentional injury to children under the age of 18 years as well as some of the actions that need to be taken in order to tackle the problem. The following are the report’s main messages.
Child injuries are a major public health issue
Injuries mar the lives of millions of young people and their families each year. The World Health Organization estimates that, in 2004, around 830 000 children under the age of 18 years died as a result of an unintentional injury. Recent community-based studies conducted by UNICEF, however, have suggested that the number could be much higher. Tens of millions more children are non-fatally injured and many of these require hospital treatment. For survivors, the impairment that injuries can cause and the resulting need for care and rehabilitation have far-reaching impacts on a child’s prospects for health, education and social inclusion and on their parents’ livelihood.
The unequal burden of injury is an additional reason to address the problem. Children in poorer countries and those from poorer families in better-off countries are the most vulnerable. More than 95% of injury deaths among children occur in low-income and middle-income countries. Approximately 40% of the deaths among those under 18 years ofage in high-income countries are the result of an injury – an indication of the fact that these countries, although doing better, still have a serious problem.
If countries do not address their child injury problem it is likely to escalate and as a result, unnecessary lives will be lost to causes that are largely preventable.
Injuries directly affect child survival
Specific concern for the lives, health and well-being of children is voiced in a series of international agreements and initiatives. Most notable of these is the Convention on the Rights of the Child, adopted in November 1989 during a session of the United Nations General Assembly, which affirms that each child has the right to the highest attainable level of health and the right to a safe environment. The Convention requires that “all appropriate legislative, administrative, social and educational measures to protect the child from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation, including sexual abuse” are taken by countries (1). Most countries in the world have ratified this convention, and it represents a powerful statement of their collective views on the responsibilities towards children.
In addition, the fourth objective of the Millennium Development Goals is to reduce by two thirds the mortality of children under five years of age by the year 2015 (2). Most countries are focusing on reducing infectious diseases. However, in many places the relative proportion of deaths as a result of injuries in this age group is significant enough to hamper the attainment of the goal if it is not addressed at the same time.
Child survival has been described as “the most pressing moral dilemma of the new millennium” (3). As injuries are a leading cause of death and disability among children worldwide, to prevent those injuries is particularly important for the wider issue of child survival and the improvement globally of child health. Injury programmes need to be integrated into other child health strategies, with ministries of health playing a pivotal role. In addition, injuries need to be included as one of the indicators in overall child survival programmes.
Children are susceptible to injuries
There is a strong association between the stage of life and the type of injuries sustained by a child. The age of a child, the stage of his or her development, how the child interacts with the world, and the type of activities the child undertakes are all relevant to this association. Among infants, for instance, fires, drowning and falls are the leading causes of injury death. Among 1–4-year-olds, as children start to move more independently, drowning becomes the leading cause of injury-related death in many places, followed by road traffic crashes and fires – the three of which combined accounting for almost two thirds of injury deaths in that age group. Over the age of five years, road traffic injuries, drowning and fires are the predominant causes.
In addition to these biological factors, there are other risk factors for child injuries. These include socioeconomic factors such as poverty, the absence of protective factors, and the environment in which children live. The quality, availability and access to medical care are important factors that can influence not only the likelihood of surviving an injury but also the long-term consequences.
“We have a duty to protect children from injury and violence. Children live in a world designed for adults, but they have special needs and are more vulnerable than adults to certain factors in their environment which may place them at additional risk of injury” Ann M. Veneman, Executive Director, UNICEF.
Child injuries can be prevented
Simply reproducing safe strategies that are relevant to adults will not protect children sufficiently. Various developmental issues, risk taking behaviours, levels of activity and the child’s degree of dependence make the matter more complicated. Prevention programmes that take into account these vulnerabilities and use a multidisciplinary approach have been shown to be the most effective for reducing child mortality as a result of injury. A number of countries have achieved remarkable reductions in their child injury death rates, in some cases by more than 50% (see Box 7.1)
How did Sweden achieve its reductions in child injuries? Since the early 1950s, Sweden has seen a reduction in child injuries, championed largely by the paediatrician Dr Ragnar Berfenstam (4). In 1969 the injury death rate in Sweden for boys and girls (more...)
There is no single blueprint for success but six basic principles underlie most of the successful child injury prevention programmes around the world. These are:
legislation and regulations, and their enforcement;
supportive home visits;
the promotion of safety devices;
education and the teaching of skills.
In countries where the greatest reductions have been recorded, a combination of these approaches has been employed. In addition, countries that encourage a culture of safety and display strong political commitment have made great progress in reducing their child injury burden.
As important as the idea of “what works” is the notion of “what to avoid”. Certain prevention strategies have been tested in high-income countries and found to have no beneficial effects. There are some that even have negative consequences. Countries planning child injury prevention programmes should be aware of these dangers.
Furthermore, a reliance on the single, stand-alone injury prevention strategy of educating children (or their parents) in order to change children’s behaviour – while common – is sadly misplaced. This is not to say that education is unnecessary. It is indeed a valuable component that should be incorporated into most injury prevention strategies, and a useful tool to encourage the use of passive measures – actions that people have to do themselves, such as putting on a helmet. However, there is no evidence to show that education on its own can reduce injuries.
Child injury prevention strategies should be based on available evidence (see Table 7.1). Interventions should be prioritized after considering the scale of the problem, and the known effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and cost of each intervention.
Key approaches to addressing child injuries.
“Evidence is the foundation for setting priorities, crafting policies, and measuring results. Evidence can have great persuasive power at the policy level.” Dr Margaret Chan, WHO Director-General.
The cost of doing nothing is unacceptable
For many parents, the grief of losing a child unexpectedly can take decades to heal and for many it never does. For some families the emotional pain is even greater if simple measures could have been taken to prevent the incident. Even if the outcome is not fatal, the medical costs and the special care that is often needed for a severely injured or disabled child can put a huge financial demand on parents and cause great difficulties for families or caretakers.
In addition to what parents, siblings, families and communities have to endure, child injuries also place a significant strain on often overstretched health care systems. The cost of primary prevention programmes is much cheaper than treating a child, sometimes for months, because of a preventable injury. Many wealthier countries have already implemented cost-effective primary prevention programmes that have led to a reduction in health-care costs. In the United States, for instance, it has been estimated that for every one US dollar spent on a child car seat, there is a saving of 29 dollars in direct and indirect health care costs and other costs to society. If similarly effective interventions to prevent child injury were implemented around the world, many thousands of lives would be saved (see Box 7.2). Injury prevention can thus be a very cost-effective public health strategy, with the costs of interventions often much lower than the costs of the consequences of injury.
Saving 1000 children a day. In 2002 more than 875 000 children died from preventable injuries while millions more were injured or permanently disabled. Many of these injuries, such as poisonings, falls, and burns, occurred in or near the home. Others, (more...)
“...We cannot accept these injuries as just accidents that will happen. If a disease were killing our children at the rate that unintentional injuries are, the public would be unbelievably outraged and demand that this killer be stopped.” Former United States Surgeon General, C. Everett Koop, 2001.
Few countries have good data on child injury
Data on injury and its determinants are essential for identifying priority issues and high-risk groups, and also for understanding the underlying causes of injury. In addition, agreement on the definitions of specific injuries is essential for accurate measurement and comparability. The availability of good quality data and of trained people to analyse such data are therefore important in the search for effective prevention interventions (see Box 7.3). By the same token, a lack of data can hold back action for want of evidence, prevent priorities from being correctly set, and hamper research and the evaluation of interventions.
The Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP). CHIRPP is an emergency department-based injury surveillance programme operated by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) in collaboration with 14 hospitals (6). The programme (more...)
In developed countries, detailed analysis of sound data has undoubtedly been instrumental in achieving high rates of success in child injury prevention. Elsewhere, data on child death and injury are generally either of a poor quality or missing. Furthermore, discrepancies in data collected are sometimes used as excuses not to do anything, where they could instead serve as a foundation to strengthen information systems.
A major difficulty in child injury prevention, as with all injury prevention, is obtaining reliable estimates of the scale and pattern of child injury and death. To this end, the volume, quality and availability of national and regional data needs to be increased through a combination of:
better data collection systems;
use of hospital discharge systems (including ICD external cause codes);
more community-based surveys on child injury (using standard protocols).
Research on child injuries is too limited
Reductions in child injury mortality have been achieved in some developed countries as a result of the application of evidence-based programmes based on rigorous research and priority-setting. Unfortunately, such research is not widespread even in all high-income countries and is particularly limited in low-income and middle-income countries, resulting in a significant gap in knowledge.
Research on child injury should not only concern the evaluation of intervention studies but also include:
programme effectiveness studies;
behavioural and developmental science research;
health utilization analyses.
Research into the whole spectrum of child injuries in developing countries – from primary prevention through to rehabilitation – needs much higher levels of funding. Such research will not only benefit developing countries enormously, but has the potential to uncover solutions not yet found in high-income countries.
There are too few practitioners in child injury prevention
Most countries around the world have limited human capacity to prevent the epidemic of child injuries, deliver emergency and ongoing care following an injury, and provide appropriate rehabilitation services. This problem is particularly acute in poorer countries where the bur-den of child injury is greatest. In many settings around the world public health training does not address issues related to child injury. Medical courses teach students how to treat trauma but usually overlook prevention. Furthermore, government staff in sectors relevant to child injury do not as a rule receive training on injuries and do not work in a structure that enables information on injury prevention to be shared effectively (see Box 7.4).
Developing knowledge and skills for child injury prevention. While capacity building in the field of child injury prevention is not limited to human resources, knowledge and skills are nonetheless a clear priority. One tool to develop the knowledge base (more...)
Child injury prevention is the responsibility of many sectors
Child injury prevention, by the very nature of the type of injuries involved, should be a responsibility shared between governments, nongovernmental organizations, academic institutions, international agencies and the business sector.
The health sector has a leading role to play (8), particularly with regard to:
collecting and analysing data;
carrying out research on risk factors;
implementing, monitoring and evaluating interventions;
delivering appropriate primary, secondary and tertiary care;
campaigning for greater attention to the issue of child injuries.
All the same, a multisectoral approach is indeed necessary. The sectors of transport, police, education, law and environment all play a major role in the prevention and control of childhood injuries. Preventing injuries from falls in schools comes under the remit of the education ministry, for instance, while the legal sector will be responsible for legislating for mandatory child-resistant containers. The collaboration between sectors has to cross organizational boundaries, so that the public sector, private organizations and non-profit groups can combine their expertise.
Child injury prevention is underfunded
Well-targeted investment of financial resources is needed to tackle the problem of child injuries. Over the last decade, as countries have focused on the Millennium Development Goals, much funding has been provided to address infectious diseases – the major killer of children under five years of age. It would be a tragic mistake if this good investment were to be lost after children had survived their infancy, because injury prevention had earlier been ignored. The cost-effectiveness of some child injury prevention strategies has been found to be at least equal to that of other well-accepted strategies to prevent childhood illnesses.
It is essential to engage the donor community if interventions are to be tested and implemented, especially in poorer countries. Child injury prevention needs to be a stated priority of public and private funding agencies.
Awareness needs to be created and maintained
The magnitude, risk factors and preventability of child injuries are not widely appreciated at all levels, from policy makers and donors to the local community. This lack of understanding means that the resources required are not being allocated to prevention effoorts and the political and organizational structures that are needed are not being put in place.
It is of prime importance to show that resources can be efficiently and effectively used in this area for the benefit of public health. Sustained campaigning is therefore required to raise awareness about the public health, social and economic impacts of child injuries, and how these injuries can be prevented. Awareness, of course, also needs to be created about how some risk factors are connected to other issues – such as obesity, mobility and disaster management – and how tackling these issues would reduce child injuries and improve children’s health overall.
Governments and others involved are encouraged to consider the following seven recommendations when developing child injury prevention programmes.
Recommendation 1: Integrate child injury into a comprehensive approach to child health and development
A comprehensive strategyfor childhealth and development should include all leading causes of ill health and disability among children, and therefore include injuries. Existing child survival programmes need to introduce child injury prevention strategies as part of the basic package of child health services. The current renewed emphasis on primary health care provides an opportunity for governments, ministries of health and civil society organizations to restructure their child health programmes to include child injuries.
The success of child health programmes should be measured not only by traditional measures of infectious disease mortality but also by other indicators of fatal and non-fatal injury.
Recommendation 2: Develop and implement a child injury prevention policy and a plan of action
Each country should prepare a child injury prevention and control policy bringing in a wide range of sectors. Agencies involved should include those concerned with transport, health, planning, consumer product safety, agriculture, education, and law. There should also be representation across the disciplines, with child development experts, injury epidemiologists, engineers, urban planners, clinicians, social scientists and others all participating. Concerned groups should be brought in from government, the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, the media and the general public.
The policy should take the needs of all children into account, particularly those who are vulnerable, such as poor and homeless children, children with disabilities and female children, and should be linked to other child health strategies.
A country’s child injury policy should promote the development of national standards and codes on issues that have a direct bearing on child injury, including such items as products and appliances, playground and school safety, and residential building regulations and laws.
A national strategy needs to set ambitious but realistic targets for at least five or ten years. It should have measurable outcomes and sufficient funding to develop, implement, manage, monitor and evaluate actions. Once the child injury prevention strategy is established, national and local action plans should be prepared laying down specific actions to be taken and allocating resources for these actions.
Recommendation 3: Implement specific actions to prevent and control child injuries
Specific actions are needed to prevent and control child injuries and to minimize their consequences. These actions
forming a part of the national child health strategy
should be based on sound evidence, be appropriate in terms of culture and other local context, and have been tested locally. The evaluation of interventions should be an integral part of the programme.
Chapters 1 to 6 discussed in detail specific interventions for each type of injury, their impact on the frequency and severity of injuries, and their cost-effectiveness where this was known. No standard package of interventions will be suitable for all countries. Table 7.1, though, summarized the main approaches, with some examples, that can be used.
If specific interventions are not introduced, it is unlikely that simple awareness on its own will bring about significant reductions in child injuries and deaths.
Recommendation 4: Strengthen health systems to address child injuries
The health system as a whole should be strengthened to provide high quality care to injured children, as well as rehabilitation and support services. These improvements should include:
the development and maintenance of an efficient system of pre-hospital care;
good quality acute management of injured children in hospitals and clinics, with appropriate child-specific equipment and drugs;
suitable rehabilitation programmes, addressing both the physical and psychological long-term consequences of injuries;
coordination with allied sectors to ensure holistic care and management of the injured child.
The health system should also be strengthened to provide financial protection and social support to the families and households of injured children. If this is not done, households may be pushed into poverty as a result of child injuries, especially in poorer countries.
Appropriate training programmes should be a priority. Many countries do not have sufficient personnel with the skills and experience needed to develop and implement an effective child injury prevention programme.
Governments should start this process by designating a focal person or coordinator for child injury prevention within the health ministry. The particular organizational model to be used may depend on the national situation, but it is important that accountability for child injury prevention and control is explicitly set out.
Recommendation 5: Enhance the quality and quantity of data for child injury prevention
An important element in dealing with child injuries is ascertaining the magnitude and characteristics of the problem, as well as assessing national policies on child injury and the capacity to handle such injuries. A thorough understanding is needed, not only of the volume of child injury deaths, non-fatal injuries and disabilities, but also of:
the children who are most affected;
the types of injury that are most prevalent;
the geographic areas where the greatest problems are found;
the particular risk factors;
the child health policies, programmes and specific injury interventions that are in place.
In addition to these things, standardized definitions are needed that are used across countries, not only for injuries but for disability as well.
Sources of data can differ depending on the type of injury. Road traffic injury data, for instance, may be obtained from police, health ministry and health care settings, and transport ministries. Data on falls, on the other hand, may be obtained from injury surveillance systems, community-based surveys and paediatric admission records. In any case, the limitations of these sources of data and their potential to influence what needs to be observed, should be considered before making use of them.
Information systems on child injuries should be:
simple and cost-effective to implement;
appropriate to the levels of skill of the staff using them;
consistent with national and international standards (including external cause coding).
Where possible, these systems should be integrated into other child health information systems, such as demographic and health surveys, integrated management of childhood disease surveys and verbal autopsy studies.
Data should be widely shared among the relevant authorities and concerned groups, particularly those responsible for child health, education and social services, such as child development agencies.
There are scant data on the economic impact of child injuries in most countries, though it is known that the impact is substantial. There are also no studies on the cost-effectiveness of prevention interventions. Assessing the direct and indirect economic costs, where this is possible, as well as the proportion of gross national product attributable to child injuries, can help increase awareness of the scale of the problem.
Recommendation 6: Define priorities for research, and support research on the causes, consequences, costs and prevention of child injuries
A research agenda for child injuries should be developed at regional and national levels. The agenda should be based on evidence from a broad range of sectors. Research in all the main areas related to child injury should be strengthened, including on:
economic analysis – including the cost of child injuries and the cost of interventions;
large-scale intervention trials, especially in poorer countries;
non-fatal outcomes of injury and disability;
how best to integrate injury interventions into child health programmes.
Research, if it is to be successful, requires focused investments in human and technical capacity, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. A critical mass of trained researchers on injuries and their prevention needs to be built up.
Research skills should be strengthened in a range of disciplines, including those of:
behavioural and developmental psychology;
Recommendation 7: Raise awareness of and target investments towards child injury prevention
That child injuries are predictable and preventable is often not understood, by the lay public and also by policy-makers, medical personnel and donors. It is vital, therefore, that awareness is created about the fact that these injuries can generally be prevented. It is an enormous advantage if well-known personalities or political leaders can actively champion the cause of child injury prevention. In addition, an active civil society movement for child injury prevention, grassroots local organizations for child safety, and sensitive and responsible media reports can all bring about the necessary cultural changes in society.
International conferences, furthermore, provide opportunities to exchange knowledge and establish networks and partnerships. Complementary strategies, such as introducing child injury prevention into school and university curricula, can also help sensitize young people to the risk of child injuries.
Well-targeted financial investments can reduce child injuries and deaths considerably. Assessing the costs against the benefits of specific interventions and setting priorities accordingly is important for all countries. International nongovernmental organizations and large corporations can help raise awareness at the global and national level, as can – at the local level – socially aware employers and ordinary committed citizens.
Translating recommendations into reality
The previous section presented seven recommendations which should be considered when implementing a child injury prevention strategy. Child injury prevention, though, is the responsibility of many. Reducing the risk of injury for children requires the involvement and commitment of a broad range of groups – from international agencies through to children themselves. The following are some of the actions which can be taken by the various groups involved.
International, development and donor organizations
make – in a highly visible way – child injury prevention a priority at an international level;
fund and promote research, interventions and evaluations on child injury prevention;
encourage governments to take sustainable action on child injury prevention;
support capacity-building efforts.
make child injuries a priority;
identify an agency or unit to lead child injury prevention – either within the broader child health strategy or the more specific child injury prevention plan;
appoint at least one full-time person with responsibility for injury prevention, including child injuries, in an appropriate ministry;
establish a sustainable data collection system based on the country’s needs and particular local issues related to children;
develop a multisectoral plan of action for child injury prevention, including the setting of targets (see Box 7.5);
coordinate activities and collaborate across sectors for the implementation and evaluation of child injury prevention programmes;
enact, implement and enforce laws and standards that have been proven to reduce injuries;
ensure sufficient funds and human resources for child injury prevention efforts;
provide affordable access to all levels of health care and services for all children;
promote the integration of health and safety concerns and an injury impact evaluation into all new projects;
include children and young people in the development and implementation of projects at the national and local levels.
Developing a National Action Plan for child injury prevention: the experience of the Czech Republic. In 2004, the Child Safety Action Plan was launched in 18 European countries under the umbrella of the European Child Safety Alliance (9). Its aim was (more...)
encourage governments to undertake proven child injury prevention activities and help in implementing such interventions;
identify local safety problems;
campaign for a safer environment, standards and behaviours;
campaign for the rights of those affected by injury;
undertake pilot prevention programmes on child injury in the community;
build and extend networks and partnerships with others involved in child injury prevention.
The private sector
recognize the importance of child injuries and their prevention;
apply “design for safety” from concept, through production, to quality control – including risk assessment and product approval;
ensure that products comply with safety standards, regulations and codes;
work with regulators to achieve harmonized standards and regulations worldwide;
advertise merchandise responsibly and emphasize the safety aspects;
fund ongoing research and development in the area of child injury prevention;
fund the development and evaluation of safety-promoting educational material – such as games, toys, DVDs and videos.
report responsibly, accurately and sensitively the traumatic consequences of injuries – with information on prevention always included in reports;
promote child injury prevention by featuring stories of young survivors and their families, highlighting good practices in injury prevention;
feature safe practices in radio and television dramas, and other broadcast programmes;
initiate or support child injury prevention campaigns.
Teachers and community leaders
teach injury prevention at school from a young age;
ensure that schools, playgrounds, and the access to schools are all safe;
set up and maintain safe public places and safe sports and recreational facilities;
promote injury prevention at universities and integrate the topic into existing professional programmes;
foster research into child injury prevention in educational settings;
include children and youth when implementing interventions for child injury at a community level.
create a safe environment for children to live in;
properly store materials which are harmful to children – such as fireworks and poisoning agents;
supervise potentially hazardous activities;
inform and educate children about the risk factors for injuries as well as how injuries can be prevented;
encourage children to wear safety devices;
act as role models forchildren byadoptingsafebehaviour and using safety devices;
lobby for change in the community.
Children and young people
act as role models by adopting safe methods to reduce injury risks – such as using safety devices, and playing in safe locations;
promote injury prevention among peers and family;
refrain from engaging in high-risk behaviours;
contribute to determining priorities for action;
become involved in injury prevention campaigns and programmes (see Box 7.6).
Youth Declaration for Road Safety. The first ever World Youth Assembly for Road Safety was held at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland in April 2007. Nearly 400 delegates from over 100 countries met to share experiences and ideas and identify ways (more...)
The commitment to reduce the burden of childhood diseases has often been proclaimed by international and national declarations. All the same, high levels of childhood mortality, morbidity and disability still persist. In many countries one of the reasons for this is the impact of childhood injuries, affecting children of all ages.
The global community has the knowledge, an armoury of interventions and the resources to prevent this loss of healthy life in the youngest members of our community. This report is a plea for evidence-based interventions and sustained investments by all sectors – public, private and civil – in injury prevention and control for children. It is time to unleash the promise of governments and create a world where children can learn, play, grow up and live without being killed or injured.